Israeli demolition of Palestinian property
House demolition is a method Israel has used in the Israeli-occupied territories since they came under its control in the Six-day war to achieve various aims. Broadly speaking, the house demolitions can be classified as either punitive, administrative or as "clearing operations".
Punitive house demolitions involves demolishing houses of Palestinians or neighbors and relatives of Palestinians suspected of violent acts against Israelis. These target the homes were the suspects live. Proponents of the method claim that it deters against violence. Critics claim that it has not been proven effective and might even trigger more violence.
Administrative house demolitions are done to enforce building codes and regulations, which in the occupied Palestinian territories are set by the Israeli military. Critics claim that they are used as a means to Judaize parts of the occupied territory, especially East Jerusalem.
The third type of house demolitions are "clearing operations" which are done to meet alleged needs of the Israeli military. For example, if the military believes the houses can be used for launching attacks against Israelis.
House demolition is considered a form of collective punishment. According to the law of occupation, the destruction of property, save for reasons of absolute military necessity, is prohibited. Palestinian identity is deeply impregnated with the sense of national loss and place engendered by the "catastrophe" of 1948 (al-nakba), and according to physicians studying West Bankers who have had their homes destroyed, such events cause a retraumatization of the nakba in the families affected.
The practice originated under the British Mandate, when the government gave authority to military commanders to confiscate and raze "any house, structure or land... the inhabitants of which he is satisfied have committed… any offence against these Regulations involving violence." During the 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine, the British military frequently demolished homes in villages implicated in rebel activity, with entire villages sometimes being destroyed. Some 2,000 Arab homes were demolished during the Arab revolt. In 1945, the authorities passed the Defence (Emergency) Regulations and Regulation 119 made this practice available to the local military commander without limit or appeal. The regulation states:
- "119. ― (1) A Military Commander may by order direct the forfeiture to the Government of Palestine of any house, structure, or land from which he has reason to suspect the any firearm has been illegally discharged, or any bomb, grenade or explosive or incendiary article illegally thrown, or of any house, structure or land situated in any area, town, village, quarter or street the inhabitants or some of the inhabitants of which he is satisfied have committed, or attempted to commit, or abetted the commission of, or been accessories after the fact of the commission of, any offence against the Regulations involving violence or intimidation or any Military Court offence;"...
During the Jewish insurgency against the British in the 1940s, the British only employed this tactic one time against the Jews. In August 1947, after failing to quell the Jewish insurgency, the British military received clearance from the High Commissioner to demolish Jewish homes. Subsequently, a Jewish home in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Givat Shaul, where arms were discovered during a routine search, was destroyed.
In 1968, after Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza, Theodor Meron, then legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, advised the Prime Minister's office in a top secret memorandum that house demolitions, even of suspected terrorists' residences, violated the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention on the protection of civilians in war. Undertaking such measures, as though they were in continuity with British mandatory emergency regulations, might be useful as hasbara but were "legally unconvincing". The advice was ignored. His view, according to Gershom Gorenberg, is shared by nearly all scholars of international law, prominent Israeli experts included. The practice of demolishing Palestinian houses began within two days of the conquest of the area in the Old City of Jerusalem known as the Moroccan Quarter, adjacent to the Western Wall. One of the first measures adopted, without legal authorization, on the conquest of Jerusalem in 1967 was to evict 650 Palestinians from their homes in the heart of Jerusalem, and reduce their homes and shrines to rubble in order to make way for the construction of the plaza. From the outset of the occupation of the Palestinian territories up to 2019, according to an estimate by the ICAHD, Israel has razed 49,532 Palestinian structures, with a concomitant displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
Israel regards its practice as a form of deterrence of terrorism, since a militant is thereby forced to consider the effect of his actions on his family. Before the First Intifada, the measure was considered to be used only in exceptional circumstances, but with that uprising it became commonplace, no longer requiring the Defense Minister's approval but a measure left to the discretion of regional commanders. Israel blew up 103 houses in 1987, but the following year the number skyrocketed to 423. 510 Palestinian homes of men alleged to be involved in or convicted of security offenses, or because the homes were said to function as screens for actions hostile to the Israeli army or settlers, were demolished. A further 110 were shelled in the belief armed men were inside, and overall another 1,497 were razed for lacking Israeli building permits, leaving an estimated 10,000 children homeless. Between September 2000 and the end of 2004, of the 4,100 homes the IDF razed in the territories, 628, housing 3,983 people, were undertaken as punishment because a member of a family had been involved in the Second Intifada. From 2006 until 31 August 2018, Israel demolished at least 1,360 Palestinian residential units in the West Bank (not including East Jerusalem), causing 6,115 people – including at least 3,094 minors – to lose their homes. 698 of these, homes to 2,948 Palestinians of whom 1,334 were minors, were razed in the Jordan Valley (January 2006–September 2017). Violations of building codes are a criminal offense in Israeli law, and this was only extended to the West Bank in 2007. Israel has demolished or compelled the owners to demolish, 780 homes in East Jerusalem between 2004 and 2018, leaving 2,766 people of whom 1,485 minors, homeless. The number of homes demolished in the rest of the West Bank from 2006 until 30 September 2018 is estimated to be at least 1,373, resulting in homelessness for 6,133 Palestinians, including 3,103 minors. No settler has ever been prosecuted for engaging in such infractions, and only 3% of reported violations by settlers have led to demolitions. Even huts by shepherds, on which taxes have been duly paid, can be demolished.[a]
In a 1987 letter, the British said this regulation had been repealed in 1948. However, the repeal was not published in the Palestine Gazette, as required by law at that time, and Israel still operates the contentious policy of punitive military house demolition under the 1945 British DER 119.
During the Second Intifada, the IDF adopted a policy of house demolition following a wave of suicide bombings. Israel justified the policy on the basis of deterrence against terrorism, and providing an incentive for families of potential suicide bombers to dissuade the bomber from attacking. Demolitions can also occur in the course of fighting. During Operation Defensive Shield, several IDF soldiers were killed early in the conflict while searching houses containing militants. In response, the IDF started employing a tactic of surrounding such houses, calling on the occupants (civilian and militant) to exit, and demolishing the house on top of the militants that do not surrender. This tactic, called nohal sir lachatz (Hebrew: נוהל סיר לחץ, lit. 'pressure pot'), is now used whenever feasible (i.e., non-multi rise building that is separated from other houses). In some heavy fighting incidents, especially in the 2002 Battle of Jenin and Operation Rainbow in Rafah 2004, heavily armored IDF Caterpillar D9 bulldozers were used to demolish houses to widen alleyways, uncover tunnels, or to secure locations for IDF troops. The result was an indiscriminate use of demolitions against civilian housing unconnected to terrorism that left 1,000 people homeless in the Rafah Refugee Camp.
According to a report by Amnesty International in 1999, house demolitions are usually done without prior warning and the home's inhabitants are given little time to evacuate. According to a 2004 Human Rights Watch report, many families in Rafah own a "cluster of homes". For example, the family may own a "small house from earlier days in the camp, often with nothing more than an asbestos roof". Later, sons will build homes nearby when they start their own families.
In February 2005, the Ministry of Defense ordered an end to the demolition of houses for the purpose of punishing the families of suicide bombers unless there is "an extreme change in circumstances". However, house demolitions continue for other reasons.
In 2009, after a string of fatal attacks by Palestinians against Israelis in Jerusalem, the Israeli High Court of Justice ruled in favor of the IDF to seal with cement the family homes of Palestinian terrorists as a deterrent against terrorism.
A January 2015 efficacy study by Efraim Benmelech, Berrebi and Klor distinguishes between “punitive demolitions”, in which homes belonging to the families of terror operatives are demolished, and “precautionary demolitions”, such as the demolition of a house well-positioned for use by Palestinian snipers. Their results, which The New Republic calls "politically explosive," indicate that "precautionary demolitions" have caused suicide attacks to increase, a “48.7 percent increase in the number of suicide terrorists from an average district,” while in the months immediately following a demolition, punitive demolitions caused terror attacks to decline by between 11.7 and 14.9 percent. However, Klor later described the effect of punitive demolitions as "small, localized and diminish[ing] over time" and suggested that the real reason they were carried out was "to placate the Israeli public".
House demolition is typically justified by the IDF on the basis of:
- Deterrence, achieved by harming the relatives of those who carry out, or are suspected of involvement in carrying out, attacks Benmelech, Berrebi and Klor call demolitions of this type, targeting the homes of terror operatives “punitive demolitions”.
- The following types are labeled as “precautionary demolitions” by Benmelech, Berrebi and Klor, however punishing they may feel to the impacted families.
- Counter-terrorism, by destroying militant facilities such as bombs labs, weapons factories, weapons and ammunition warehouses, headquarters, offices, and others.
- Forcing out an individual barricaded inside a house, which may be rigged with explosives, without risking soldiers' lives.
- Self-defence, by destroying possible hideouts and rocket-propelled grenade or gun posts.
- Combat engineering, clearing a path for tanks and armoured personnel carriers.
- Destroying structures rigged with booby traps and explosives in order to prevent risk to soldiers and civilians.
Human rights organisations' criticism
The United Nations (UN) and human rights groups such as Amnesty International and the International Committee of the Red Cross who oppose the house demolitions reject the IDF's claims, and document numerous instances where they argue the IDF's claims do not apply. They accuse the Israeli government and IDF of other motives:
- Collective punishment, the punishment of an innocent Palestinian "for an offence he or she has not personally committed."
- Theft of Palestinian land by annexation to build the Israeli West Bank barrier or to create, expand or otherwise benefit Israeli settlements.
According to the UN, about 1,500 homes were demolished by the IDF just in the Rafah area in the period 2000–2004.
In 2004, Human Rights Watch published the report Razing Rafah: Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip. The report documented what it described as a "pattern of illegal demolitions" by the IDF in Rafah, a refugee camp and city at the southern end of the Gaza Strip on the border with Egypt where sixteen thousand people lost their homes after the Israeli government approved a plan to expand the de facto "buffer zone" in May 2004. The IDF's main stated rationales for the demolitions were responding to and preventing attacks on its forces and the suppression of weapons smuggling through tunnels from Egypt.
Demolitions are carried out by the Israeli Army Combat Engineering Corps using armored bulldozers, usually Caterpillar D9, but also with excavators (for high multi-story buildings) and wheel loaders (for small houses with low risk) modified by the IDF. The heavily armored IDF Caterpillar D9 is often used when there is a risk demolishing the building (such as when armed insurgents are barricaded inside or the structure is rigged with explosive and booby traps). Multi-story buildings, flats, and explosive labs are demolished by explosive devices, set by IDF demolition experts of Yaalom's Sayeret Yael. Amnesty International has also described house demolitions that were carried out by the IDF using "powerful explosive charges".
The use of house demolition under international law is today governed by the Fourth Geneva Convention, enacted in 1949, which protects non-combatants in occupied territories. Article 53 provides that "Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons ... is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations."
However, Israel, which is a party to the Fourth Geneva Convention, asserts that the terms of the Convention are not applicable to the Palestinian territories on the grounds that the territories do not constitute a state which is a party to the Fourth Geneva Convention. This position is rejected by human rights organisations such as Amnesty International, which notes that "it is a basic principle of human rights law that international human rights treaties are applicable in all areas in which states parties exercise effective control, regardless of whether or not they exercise sovereignty in that area."
As a punitive measure
As a punitive measure, one study by a Northwestern and Hebrew University group concluded that prompt demolitions brought about a lowering of suicide attacks for a month and that they are an effective deterrent against terrorism. They are related to the identity of the house's owner, and result in a "significant decrease" of Palestinian terrorists attacks. Conversely, an internal IDF report of 2005, analyzing the effectiveness of the policy during the Second Intifada in which 3,000 civilian homes were demolished, found that terror attacks increased after house demolitions, only stimulated hatred of Israel, the damage caused outweighed any benefits, and recommended the practice be dropped.
Amnesty International has criticized the lack of due process in the use of house demolitions by Israel. Many demolitions are carried out with no warning or opportunity for the householder to appeal. In 2002, a proposed demolition case was appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court who ruled that there must be a right to appeal unless doing so would "endanger the lives of Israelis or if there are combat activities in the vicinity." In a later ruling, the Supreme Court decided that demolitions without advanced warning or due process can be carried out if advance notice would hinder demolition. Amnesty describes this as "a virtual green light" to demolition with no warning.
Criticism and responses
The effectiveness of house demolitions as a deterrence has been questioned. In 2005, an Israeli Army commission to study house demolitions found no proof of effective deterrence and concluded that the damage caused by the demolitions overrides its effectiveness. As a result, the IDF approved the commission's recommendations to end punitive demolitions of Palestinian houses.
A number of human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch and the ICAHD, oppose the practice. Human Rights Watch has argued that the practice violates international laws against collective punishment, the destruction of private property, and the use of force against civilians.
Israeli historian Yaacov Lozowick, however, implied that there is a moral basis for demolishing the houses of families of suicide bombers, stating:
"Demolishing the homes of civilians merely because a family member has committed a crime is immoral. If, however,... potential suicide murderers... will refrain from killing out of fear that their mothers will become homeless, it would be immoral to leave the Palestinian mothers untouched in their homes while Israeli children die on their school buses."
In May 2004, the Israeli Foreign Ministry publicly stated:
"...other means employed by Israel against terrorists is the demolition of homes of those who have carried out suicide attacks or other grave attacks, or those who are responsible for sending suicide bombers on their deadly missions. Israel has few available and effective means in its war against terrorism. This measure is employed to provide effective deterrence of the perpetrators and their dispatchers, not as a punitive measure. This practice has been reviewed and upheld by the High Court of Justice"
House demolition has been used in an on-again-off-again fashion by the Israeli government during the Second Intifada. More than 3,000 homes have been destroyed in this way. House demolition was used to destroy the family homes of Saleh Abdel Rahim al-Souwi, perpetrator of the Tel Aviv bus 5 massacre, and Yahya Ayyash, Hamas's chief bomb maker, known as "the engineer", as well as the perpetrators of the first and second Jerusalem bus 18 massacres, and the Ashkelon bus station bombing.
According to the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem:
- From October 2001 to December 2005, Israel has demolished 668 homes as punishment, leaving 4,182 people homeless.
- Israel has demolished 1,746 homes for alleged military purposes since B'Tselem started keeping statistics in this category in 2004.
- According to the UN, about 1,500 homes were demolished by the IDF in the Rafah area in the period 2000–2004.
In November 2008, B'Tselem filmed an armed Israeli Policeman wearing a riot helmet headbutt a Palestinian women. The confrontation occurred during a protest, after the Jerusalem municipality destroyed two houses because it said they were built without permission.
As a regulatory measure
Some house demolitions are allegedly performed because the houses may have been built without permits, or are in violation of various building codes, ordinances, or regulations. Amnesty International claims that Israeli authorities are in fact systematically denying building permit requests in Arab areas as a means of appropriating land. This is disputed by Israeli sources, who claim that both Arabs and Jews enjoy a similar rate of application approvals.
According to Amnesty International, "The destruction of Palestinian homes, agricultural land and other property in the Occupied Territories, including East Jerusalem, is inextricably linked with Israel’s long-standing policy of appropriating as much as possible of the land it occupies, notably by establishing Israeli settlements." In October 1999, during the "Peace Process" and before the start of the Second Intifada, Amnesty International wrote that: "well over one third of the Palestinian population of East Jerusalem live under threat of having their house demolished. ... Threatened houses exist in almost every street and it is probable that the great majority of Palestinians live in or next to a house due for demolition."
"House demolitions ostensibly occur because the homes are built 'illegally' – i.e. without a permit. Officials and spokespersons of the Israeli government have consistently maintained that the demolition of Palestinian houses is based on planning considerations and is carried out according to the law. ... But the Israeli policy has been based on discrimination. Palestinians are targeted for no other reasons than that they are Palestinians. ... [Israel has] discriminated in the application of the law, strictly enforcing planning prohibitions where Palestinian houses are built and freely allowing amendments to the plans to promote development where Israelis are setting up settlements."
"The thinking is that a national threat calls for a national response, invariably aggressive. Accordingly, a Jewish house without a permit is an urban problem; but a Palestinian home without a permit is a strategic threat. A Jew building without a permit is ‘cocking a snook at the law’; a Palestinian doing the same is defying Jewish sovereignty over Jerusalem."
Current demolition issues
The Palestinian village Aqabah, located in the northeastern West Bank, is threatened by demolition orders issued by the Israeli Civil Administration against the entire village. The Civil Administration had previously expropriated large areas of privately registered land in the village, and as of May 2008 it has threatened to demolish the following structures: the mosque, the British government-funded medical clinic, the internationally funded kindergarten, the Rural Women's Association building, the roads, the water tank, and nearly all private homes. According to the Rebuilding Alliance, a California-based organization that opposes house demolitions, Haj Sami Sadek, the mayor of the village, has circulated an open letter asking for assistance. Gush Shalom, the Israeli Peace Bloc, and the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions are said to be supporting the campaign.
In May 2008, a UN agency said that thousands of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank risk being displaced as the Israeli authorities threaten to tear down their homes and in some cases entire communities. "To date, more than 3,000 Palestinian-owned structures in the West Bank have pending demolition orders, which can be immediately executed without prior warning," the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said in a report.
Statistics for Jerusalem
Statistics have been compiled by ICAHD recording the number of demolitions of existing houses in the two parts of Jerusalem. According to ICAHD, there are many more building violations in the western (Jewish) parts of Jerusalem, but the great majority of actual demolitions are carried out in the eastern (Palestinian) parts. ICAHD statistics on house demolitions in Jerusalem were cited in the "2005 County Reports on Human Rights Practices" by the United States Department of State. For 2004 and 2005 ICAHD's figures are as follows:
|West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem||West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem|
|Charges filed||980 (18%)||780 (56%)||1529 (27%)||857 (67%)|
|Administrative demolishing orders||50||216||approximately 40||approximately 80|
|Demolitions||13 (0.2%)||114 (8.2%)||26 (0.45%)||76 (5.97%)|
ICAHD's report further claims that building inspectors record only a small proportion of the infractions in West Jerusalem (usually illegal extensions or porches), and say that no entire residential building in the Western section has ever received demolition orders or been demolished. ICAHD claims that: "The Jerusalem Municipality expropriates land, prevents preparation of a town planning scheme for Palestinian neighborhoods, and refuses to grant building permits, causing a severe housing shortage, forcing residents to build without a permit, after which the Ministry of Interior and the Municipality demolish the houses, so the residents move into homes outside the city, and then the Ministry of Interior revokes their residency and banishes them from the city forever".
ICAHD's conclusions have been disputed by the Israeli Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, who argue on their website that the larger number of Palestinian demolitions is simply because many more Palestinian homes have been built illegally. They claim to have "document[ed] a pattern of politically-motivated behavior and criminal profiteering that characterizes much of the construction in the Arab sector of the Holy City", notwithstanding the punitive house demolitions, which have been effective as a deterrent against terrorism by means of a 'significant decrease' Palestinian terrorists attacks.
|West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem||West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem||West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem||West Jerusalem||East Jerusalem|
Though the statistics do not show the nationality of the permit requestee nor the nationality of the land owner, CAMERA argues that these figures show that the denial of permits to Arabs and Jews is not based on the ethnicity of the applicant, but instead is generally meant to uphold Israeli master plans and building codes.
In contrast, Amnesty International highlight in these figures the small number of Palestinian permit requests (only about 10 percent of the Israeli requests), and argue that this is indicative of the tiny (and ever-shrinking) percentage of land that the Palestinians have available for their use. In 2008 Nicoletta Dimova wrote in the Palestine-Israel Journal that "today, the city's Palestinians are only allowed to build on about 9% of the 17,600 acres of land comprising East Jerusalem", the remainder having been expropriated by Israeli authorities for use by Israeli settlers or as land where Israel currently permits no construction.
According to Peace Now, approvals for building in Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem has expanded by 60% since Trump became US president in 2017. Since 1991, Palestinians who make up the majority of the residents in the area have only received 30% of the building permits.
According to B'tselem, since the 1993 Oslo Accords Israel has issued over 14,600 demolition orders for Palestinian infrastructure, of which it has destroyed roughly 2,925. In the period 2000-2012, Palestinian were given only 211 permits to build, from 2009-2012, only 27 permits were given. In 2014, according to Ma'an News Agency, citing Bimkom, only one such permit was issued.[unreliable source?][clarification needed]
- 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict#Destruction of homes
- Roof knocking
- Disinvestment from Israel
- International law and Israeli settlements
- Jeff Halper
- Rachel Corrie, US citizen killed in 2003 protesting the use of bulldozers to destroy Palestinian houses.
- "An old man, Salim Id Al-Hathalin, grabs hold of me. He is waving papers - one a receipt from the tax authorities, confirming that he has paid taxes on the land he owns here in the village; the other a demolition order issued by the Civil Administration against his makeshift tent-cum-hut, which he points out to me as he cries: 'Why do they want to destroy my house? Where can I go? Can I go to America? I have nothing and they want to take that nothing from me. Can you help me? Where am I supposed to go?'"
- House demolitions as punishment B'Tselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories
- Efraim Benmelech, Claude Berrebi, and Esteban F. Klor, 'Counter-Suicide-Terrorism: Evidence from House Demolitions,' in The Journal of Politics, vol. 77, no. 1 (January 2015), pp. 27–43.
- Ludovica Iaccino, ['Israel's punitive demolition of Palestinian terrorist houses 'decreases suicide attacks','] International Business Times, 10 December 2014.
- According to the study "Counter-Suicide-Terrorism: Evidence from House Demolitions," demolishing the homes of Palestinian terrorists results in "an immediate, significant decrease in the number of suicide attacks." Blank, Cynthia (2014-12-11). "Study Finds Israeli Home Demolitions Do Deter Terrorists". Arutz Sheva. Retrieved 2015-01-25.
- Avi Kober,Israel's Wars of Attrition:Attrition Chanllenges to DSemocratic States Routledge 2009 p.131.
- "Document - Israel/Occupied Territories: House Demolition". Amnesty International. Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- "Demolition and dispossession: the destruction of Palestinian homes" (PDF). Amnesty International. p. 31.
The objective of the Israeli authorities since then has been to transform the ethnic character of the annexed area from Arab to Jewish. The policy has been set by Israeli governments and largely implemented by the Jerusalem Municipality.
- Israel and the Occupied Territories Under the rubble: House demolition and destruction of land and property Archived 2014-12-07 at the Wayback Machine by Amnesty International, 18 May 2004.
- "The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD)". ICAHD. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
- Shane Darcy (2003). "Israel's Punitive House Demolition Policy Collective Punishment in Violation of International Law" (PDF). Al-Haq.
Israel’s punitive house demolition policy constitutes one of the most egregiousof war crimes. The actions taken under this policy meet all the elements of thewar crime of extensive destruction of property, not justified by military necessityand carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
- Shahak 1974, p. 184.
- HRW 2017a.
- Al-Krenawai, Graham & Sehwail 2004, p. 193.
- Hiltermann 1990, p. 88.
- Schwartz, Yishai (8 December 2014). "Israel Destroys Homes to Deter Terrorists. A New Study Says It Works—But Is It Moral?". The New Republic. Retrieved 9 December 2014.
- Golani, Motti: Palestine Between Politics and Terror, 1945-1947, p. 201
- Harvard Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine The Legality of House Demolitions under International Humanitarian Law. Retrieved 30 June 2007.
- Hoffman, Bruce: Anonymous Soldiers (2015)
- Gershom Gorenberg, 'Israel knew all along that settlements, home demolitions were illegal,' Haaretz 19 May 2015.
- Hiltermann 1995, pp. 55–56.
- Tolan 2015, p. 56.
- ICAND 2017.
- Bregman 2014, pp. 152–153.
- Bregman 2014, p. 153.
- Graff 2015, pp. 173–174.
- Efrat 2006, p. 89. sfn error: no target: CITEREFEfrat2006 (help)
- B'Tselem 2018a. sfn error: no target: CITEREFB'Tselem2018a (help)
- B'Tselem 2017c.
- B'Tselem 2018c.
- B'Tselem 2018d.
- Shafir 2017, p. 75.
- Shulman 2018, p. 28.
- In a 1987 letter, the British Foreign Ministry indicated that "in view of the Palestine (Revocations) Order in Council 1948 (S.I. 1948/1004, at 1350-51), the Palestine (Defense) Order in Council 1937 and the Defense Regulations 1945 made under it are, as a matter of English law, no longer in force." See Emma Playfair, "Demolition and Sealing of Houses as a Punitive Measure in the Israeli-Occupied West Bank," Al Haq, 33, April 1987.
- "Razing Rafah: Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip". Human Rights Watch. October 17, 2004. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
- Israel: House demolitions -- Palestinians given "15 minutes to leave... Amnesty International. December 8, 1999
- "Razing Rafah - Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip". Human Rights Watch. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2018-08-21.
- BBC News, "Israel limits house demolitions", Thursday, 17 February 2005
- "Lords Hansard text for 18 Nov 201018 Nov 2010 (pt 0001)". Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- "Court Orders Home of Jerusalem Yeshiva Terrorist Sealed Off". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- Rosenberg, Yair (9 December 2014). "Study Finds Israeli House Demolitions Deter Terrorism". Tablet. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2005-03-12. Retrieved 2008-04-17.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Israel's top court approves razing Palestinian homes, Znet
- Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, International Committee of the Red Cross
- Update to Amnesty International’s briefing to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination , Amnesty International, 1 February 2007
- "Israeli troops raze Rafah houses". BBC News. 2004-08-12. Retrieved 2010-05-04.
- "Razing Rafah - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS". Human Rights Watch. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
- "Razing Rafah - I. SUMMARY". Human Rights Watch. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
- "Razing Rafah". Human Rights Watch. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2009-09-29.
- "Razing Rafah - IV. THE SECURITY SITUATION IN RAFAH". Human Rights Watch. 2004-10-17. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
- Fourth Geneva Convention, International Committee of the Red Cross
- Alan Dowty, The Jewish State: A Century Later, University of California Press, 2001, ISBN 0-520-22911-8, p. 217.
- Gerson, Allan. Israel, the West Bank, and International law, Routledge, 28 September 1978, ISBN 0-7146-3091-8, p. 82.
- Roberts, Adam, "Decline of Illusions: The Status of the Israeli-Occupied Territories over 21 Years" in International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 64, No. 3. (Summer, 1988), pp. 345-359., p. 350
- Daniel Byman, A High Price:The Triumphs and Failures of Israeli Counterterrorism, Oxford University Press p.167.
- "Is the House Demolition Policy Legal under International Humanitarian Law?". Archived from the original on September 28, 2007.
- "Gaza: IDF House Demolition Injures Refugees (Human Rights Watch Press release, Gaza, October 24, 2002)". www.hrw.org.
- Yaacov Lozowick (2004): "Right to Exist: A Moral Defense of Israel's Wars" ISBN 1-4000-3243-1. p.260
- "2BackToHomePage3". Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- Glenn, Kessler (2009-03-05). "Clinton Criticizes Israel's Eviction, Demolition Plans". Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-04-15.
- Through No Fault of Their Own: Israel's Punitive House Demolitions in the al-Aqsa Intifada. B'Tselem
- Katz, 160
- Palestine Facts Archived 2007-07-03 at the Wayback Machine. Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs
- Katz, 280-281
- B'Tselem, B'Tselem - House demolitions as punishment - Statistics:
- B'Tselem, B'Tselem - Demolition for Alleged Military Purposes - Statistics:
- Bowcott, Owen (2008-11-25). "Israeli policeman headbutts woman in Palestinian demolition clashes - Human rights group B'Tselem films violence at demonstrations as police move in to destroy 'illegal' homes". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2008-11-25.
- "Illegal Construction in Jerusalem by Justus Reid Weiner". Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- "Document". Retrieved 18 April 2016.
- Dr. Meir Margalit, (2007): "No Place Like Home" Archived 2007-09-25 at the Wayback Machine
- "The lament of Iqrit and Kafr Birim". Archived from the original on 2008-12-04.
- "Contact Us « Rebuilding Alliance". Rebuildingalliance.org. 2010-05-28. Retrieved 2010-10-03.[permanent dead link]
- "Al Aqabah Kindergarten and their Village". Archived from the original on 2008-10-13.
- "Israeli demolition threatens 3,000 Palestinian homes: UN - Yahoo! Canada News".
- 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Israel and the occupied territories, United States Department of State, 8 March 2006
- Chronology of Permit Applications, Demolitions & Rebuilding Archived 2007-05-24 at the Wayback Machine ICAHD, Oct. 2, 2003
- Washington Post Watch CAMERA, February, 2007
- Building Permits Issued in Jerusalem Archived 2008-05-11 at the Wayback Machine FMEP, 2001
- When Ideology Leads to Destruction: Home Demolitions in East Jerusalem Palestine-Israel Journal, 2008
- "New data shows Israeli settlement surge in east Jerusalem". AP. 2019-09-12. Retrieved 2019-09-13.
- "New data shows Israeli settlement surge in east Jerusalem". Ynetnews. December 9, 2019.
- Acting the Landlord: Israel's Policy in Area C, the West Bank, B'tselem June 2013 p.19
- 'Israel's West Bank housing policy by numbers,' Ma'an News Agency 10 May 2015.